Return to Archives
Return to Article Summaries
October 2005, Vol. 4 Issue 9
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY'S "TARGETS OF
OPPORTUNITY" MODEL
Colorado State University’s (CSU) Division of
Continuing Education (DCE) falls under the
Self-Funded Independent Unit business model.
Under Colorado state law, DCE operates as an
enterprise unit that pays its own bills from the
tuition dollars it generates in its distance
education degree and certificate programs
(online and other distance learning delivery
modes), credit and non-credit courses (delivered
both on-campus and at a distance), and custom
training for businesses and industry (delivered
both on-campus and at a distance).
DCE is the sales, marketing and coordination
unit for all these offerings. It is also
responsible for registering students and
assisting students with their access to distance
education courses. For our purposes here, we are
focused on DEC’s distance-delivered courses and
programs.
Responsibilities
The academic units are responsible for course
and program development and get assistance from
the CSU Office of Instructional Services (OIS),
which is the university-wide organization
responsible for providing media and
instructional technology support for
instruction, outreach, and other purposes for
faculty, staff, and graduate teaching
assistants. Depending on the curriculum, an
on-campus or off-campus unit handles technical
support (Embanet is the outsourced company used
for business courses). As noted on the OIS
website, “all distance education programs that
originate from CSU are conducted in cooperation
with Division of Continuing Education and are at
full cost recovery. Methods of cost recovery
vary based on transmission media.”
Where It All Begins
DCE Program Director for Certificates, Online
and Independent Learning Al Powell characterizes
the DCE business model as one that seizes
“targets of opportunity” that start from a
variety of sources, including, for example,
outside industry training program opportunities,
internal department requests to increase access,
or a local market of community college graduates
seeking four-year degrees.
When potential targets of opportunity present
themselves “two things happen simultaneously,”
says Powell. “ We start talking to the academic
department involved, and we try to figure out a
way to do market research that will tell us what
the prospects are for success.” This early
discussion and research process is followed
through with a business plan that outlines
development costs and timelines. As part of
DCE’s coordination efforts, Powell and other
executive-level staff members make curriculum
development suggestions based on their market
studies.
Quality Control
Once a program of study is in full swing, the
customary student and faculty evaluation
processes and surveys one would find in any CSU
on-campus program are used for distance
education, and the evaluation results typically
drive improvement and change accordingly. For
instance, “student feedback can lead to updating
[electronic] course materials,” says Powell.
Overall, DCE is in a non-academic role. However,
both Powell and Program Director for Distance
Degrees Debi Colbert have indirectly assisted
with finding adjunct faculty members to teach
DCE courses. “We are big proponents of sheer
dumb luck,” Powell says jokingly, referring to
one instance where he helped find a highly
qualified and talented economics instructor
though a listserv he belonged to.
Organizational
Structure
DCE has an efficient organizational structure
that includes divisions for Enrollment Services,
Finance, Distribution and Information
Technology. Eight program directors oversee the
following business units: Distance Degrees and
Certificates, Online and Independent Learning
offered through its Online and Distance Learning
division; graduate degrees and certificates and
professional development seminars offered
through its Denver programs; and evening
credit/contract courses offered through its
Northern Colorado programs.
“Each program director has a chunk of business
that they specialize in, but we do move back and
forth and support each other as needed,” says
Powell.
Revenue Split
Eighty percent of all DCE revenues come from
distance education programs. “When we enroll a
student, the tuition is split between us and the
department, or us and the instructor and the
department,” says Powell. “We have to keep our
agreements with the departments as such that
everybody can stay alive.”
“We are closer to having one kind of split,”
adds Colbert. “Currently they are a little
scattered, but we have to pay our overhead to
the university, and we have to make a certain
amount just to keep our doors open. Then we try
to give the majority of the revenues back to the
department.”
“It varies a lot,” Powell concurs. “Each program
director sets up an agreement with each
department relative to the program they are
teaching.” For example, the revenue distribution
percentages for evening credit classes or
independent learning classes, or correspondence
courses are different than the revenue
distribution percentages for distance degree
classes. “But we are right now making the
process more consistent and more uniform and
more predictable than it has been in the past.”
Faculty Compensation
Regarding instructor compensation for teaching,
Powell explains that “most of the time the money
travels from us to the department, and then the
department makes its own deal on how that money
is shared.” For course development compensation,
Powell says that there are multiple models in
place, as well as “a lot of evolution taking
place.” For instance, some of the more
technologically savvy faculty at CSU have
already converted much of their on-campus
courses to the online modality on their own time
and therefore are not seeking any serious
compensation to officially offer their course
online. Or, where there is a need for an online
course that has yet to be developed “we can go
to a faculty member and find out if they are
willing to develop it and start negotiating with
them on what it will cost,” says Powell. “The
average cost for development of an online course
over the last seven years has ranged from $3,000
to $5,000, with it being closer to $3,000 most
of the time.”
Ad-Hoc vs. Formal
DCE does have formal mechanisms in place for
keeping track of its financial strength and
planning primarily through the diligent work of
its program directors who are given a great deal
of authority to operate as revenue producing
business units. “Every program we have must be
set up as a financially sustainable business
model,” says Powell.
However, the structure for the early processes
for determining whether or not a curriculum goes
online, compensating faculty, and ultimately
managing quality and learning effectiveness
seems to happen more on an ad-hoc level, which
Powell believes is advantageous to DCE. “I think
it speeds up the process and lets people work
together without getting caught up in
structure,” he says. “CSU is not a highly formal
institution in character as a Land Grant
institution, and because it is located in a part
of the United States where people tend to be a
little less formal.”
New Developments and
Future Steps
In the meantime, DCE recently added on a
positive new development to its order of
business and is about to implement a new,
revenue-enhancing initiative to its offerings.
DCE signed a contract with the State of Colorado
to become the continuing-education-approved
entity for all state employees, both at a
distance and in face-to-face classes. In
addition, DCE will soon be offering
reduced-priced, non-credit enrollment options
for its historical for-credit, online offerings.
“There are plenty of courses we offer that have
value,” says Powell, adding that the
lower-priced courses may entice a viable market
of non degree-seeking adult learners who are
interested in the many courses offered by DCE
that are professional-development and
work-skill-enhancement oriented. |
|
Return to Archives
Return to Article Summaries
Copyright. All rights reserved. Lorenzo Associates, Inc., P.O. Box 74, Clarence
Center, NY 14032. |