THE DIGITAL OPTIMIST: VIRTUAL HIGH SCHOOLS AND
HIGHER EDUCATION
by George Lorenzo
Last month I was very fortunate
to see another aspect of online teaching and
learning that is just as revolutionary as what’s
occurring today in higher education: our
country’s virtual high school movement.
The University of California
College Preparatory Initiative - a project of
the University of California based at the
University of California, Santa Cruz, which
provides online Advanced Placement and Honors
courses to under-served populations in
California, hosted the Virtual High School
Summer Institute 2002. This 2.5-day Institute
was supported by the Western Cooperative for
Educational Telecommunications (WCET) and funded
by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.
More than 50 virtual high school leaders from
across the country, representing 20 states, were
in attendance.
I attended the Institute as
part of a group from Knowledge Base, LLC.
Together with the Clovis Unified School
District, we had written a 120-page study that
was distributed to Institute attendees, titled
"The California Virtual School Report: A
National Survey of Virtual Education Practice
and Policy with Recommendations for the State of
California." As part of my work on the study, I
had interviewed about 20 virtual high school
educators, directors and principals from a wide
variety of states. Now I was meeting 50 more
people involved with virtual high schools, as
well as listening to and recording their
presentations and discussions for a synopsis I
wrote titled "Summary of Proceedings from the
Virtual High School Summer Institute 2002."
The information gleaned from
all this has major implications inside higher
education, particularly within schools and
colleges of education, as well as other higher
education entities that provide professional
development to K-12 teachers.
One major concern revolves
around training high school teachers how to
supplement their classrooms with technology as
well as teach fully online courses. Part of the
problem is that many high school students are
more web savvy than their teachers.
Many Institute attendees felt
that today’s schools and colleges of education
were missing the boat on this very important
issue. One attendee explained how the increasing
number of enrollments in virtual high schools
makes schools and colleges of education nervous.
Why? Two reasons: Higher education is not
prepared for the growing influx of educational
technology savvy students about to enter their
programs; and higher education is not prepared
to teach pre-service teachers how to effectively
use technology in education.
Other attendees explained how
there is a need for schools and colleges of
education to take the cost and time of training
high school teachers in uses of technology off
the backs of the virtual high schools as they
experience state budget cuts and a serious lack
of resources and infrastructure to do their own
teacher training.
Another attendee voiced a
differing opinion, saying that K-12 should not
necessarily look toward higher education to help
with the training of virtual high school
teachers because higher education, in general,
has not yet figured out how to effectively train
its own faculty.
Other important issues
discussed at the Institute were course
development and course leasing. Virtual high
schools, with their limited budgets and staffs,
seem to be hard pressed to develop their own
online courses, so they lease online courses
from for-profit companies.
A number of higher education
institutions such as UC Berkeley, UCLA, the
University of Texas at Austin, and others are
making significant strides in the area of
virtual high school course development by
helping to create sophisticated online courses
for schools in their states, but it looks like
for-profit companies such as Apex Learning and
Class.com are making the most headway in leasing
fully developed and tested online courses to
virtual high schools.
Finally the Institute has set
the stage for starting up a national virtual
K-12 organization, and more people in
online higher education should take notice of
this and perhaps become involved. After all, be
it virtual 9th grade or virtual grade 16, the
numbers of educational technology savvy students
are moving pretty fast, and educators at both
levels need to maintain the pace. |