Return to Archives
Return to Article Summaries
April 2002, Vol. 1, Issue 4
ARE YOU CONCERNED ABOUT COMPETITION COMING IN
FROM FOR-PROFIT INSTITUTIONS AND E-LEARNING
COMPANIES?
Perhaps Matkin
summed it up best when he said "No. I feel that
if we can’t distinguish ourselves from those
institutions, then we should not be associated
with universities." Finney added that "at the
end of the day, they (for-profit entities) have
to make their shareholders happy. For us, at the
end of the day, we have to make our students
happy." However, some of the other interviewees,
including Matkin and Finney, also talked about
partnership possibilities with the for-profit
sector, but many of these possibilities were
slow-moving and only in the discussion phase at
the time of these interviews (see Q & A about
partnerships).Heeger: I worry about
them in terms of competing with us; on the other
hand, I have no illusions. We are not a
for-profit entity; I don’t have millions of
dollars to market the institution. Our goal at
UMUC is to build the best university for adults
in the world using online education as a
modality. Does that mean we have to be the
biggest? No. Does it mean that we have to be the
best in terms of how we work with our students
and the intellectual quality of our work and the
quality of our student services? Yes. And does
it mean that we want to be leaders in producing
research in the pedagogy of online learning and
the like? Absolutely. So, I think our challenge
is to confront the Capellas and the Phoenixes in
the marketplace, but not let them define us as a
university.
Magid: We think there are lessons to be
learned from the private sector. We don’t view
them as competition, but we do view them as an
interesting and useful business model. And
potentially we can partner with them in
delivering some of our products to other parts
of the market.
Lynch: For GWSolutions and continuing
education, we see it as a possibility for
licensing some materials from companies like
SmartForce and then integrating them [with
ours]. One of our strategies is not to reinvent
the wheel, but to license good curriculum that
passes our standards test and then - where we
believe it needs enhancing with extra services
and user support and perhaps even additional
content - we can add value to those courses.
Almeda: There’s no doubt it’s a more
competitive world than it was. But the success
of for-profit programs demonstrates a couple of
things. One is the large need of education,
generally - part of which is not met today - and
the need for flexibility and responsiveness when
providing education. I think that having some of
the for-profit entities engaged in this area
reminds us in higher education that we need to
be responsive to students. So I don’t see that
as a problem. I think because it is such a good
headline grabber, a lot of times people act like
this is some kind of a dual - online education
is going to take over the world, and traditional
education won’t exist. I think that’s
wrong-headed. I really think there is a lot of
un-met need there. What we are really doing is
expanding the opportunities and choices for
students. |
|
Return to Archives
Return to Article Summaries
Copyright. All rights reserved. Lorenzo Associates, Inc., P.O. Box 74, Clarence
Center, NY 14032. |